COM. v. ADAMS


254 Pa.Super. 62 (1978)

385 A.2d 525

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Adolphus ADAMS, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided April 13, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Auerback, Assistant Public Defender, Media, for appellant.

D. Michael Emuryan, Assistant District Attorney and Frank T. Hazel, District Attorney, Media, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WATKINS, President Judge, and JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT and SPAETH, JJ.


SPAETH, Judge:

Appellant was convicted by a jury of conspiracy, although acquitted on other charges. On this appeal he argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. We agree.1

"[T]he test of the sufficiency of the evidence — irrespective of whether it is direct or circumstantial, or both — is whether, accepting, as true all the evidence and all reasonable

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases