THIGPEN v. PIVER

No. 774SC842.

246 S.E.2d 67 (1978)

37 N.C. App. 382

Jesse THIGPEN v. Dr. James W. PIVER.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 1, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Turner & Harrison by Fred W. Harrison, Kinston, for plaintiff-appellant-appellee.

Marshall, Williams, Gorham & Brawley by Daniel Lee Brawley and Ronald H. Woodruff, Wilmington, for defendant-appellant-appellee.


BRITT, Judge.

PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL

By his first assignment of error, plaintiff contends the trial court erred in finding as a fact that plaintiff's counsel knew that the cost of taking plaintiff's deposition in the previous action would be an item of costs in that action. Plaintiff argues that this finding is not supported by competent evidence. We find no merit in this assignment.

It is clear that findings of fact may be based on competent evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases