1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 83 Wis.2d
  5. 83 Wis.2d 224 (1978)
 

PEASLEY v. STATE

No. 76-130-CR.

83 Wis.2d 224 (1978)

265 N.W.2d 506

PEASLEY, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 2, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the briefs of Howard B. Eisenberg, state public defender, and Mark Lukoff, assistant state public defender.

For the defendant in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and David J. Becker, assistant attorney general.

HANLEY, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Should this court, by the application of the concurrent sentence doctrine, decline to review the defendant's appeal of one of two convictions for which identical and concurrent sentences were imposed?

2. Is the evidence sufficient to support the trial court's finding that the defendant was guilty of possessing cocaine with the intent to deliver?

Concurrent Sentence Doctrine

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases