QUILLIAN, Presiding Judge.
The board of workmen's compensation found that claimant's eye condition was not caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The denial of compensation was affirmed by the trial court and appeal followed. Held:
1. The testimony of an eye specialist in response to a hypothetical question, based on the findings and diagnosis testified to by another doctor, was admissible and not subject to the objections...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
