1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 246 S.E.2d
  5. 246 S.E.2d 52 (1978)
 

MURRAY v. MURRAY

No. 7726DC824.

246 S.E.2d 52 (1978)

37 N.C. App. 406

Mildred P. MURRAY v. Albert L. MURRAY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 1, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lindsey, Schrimsher, Erwin, Bernhardt & Hewitt by Lawrence Hewitt, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.

Henderson, Henderson & Shuford by David H. Henderson, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee.

HEDRICK, Judge.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff's motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The plaintiff recognizes the familiar rule promulgated in Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390, 417, 180 S.E.2d 297, 311 (1971), that the trial court cannot direct a verdict or enter judgment NOV "in favor of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases