STATE v. PONCE

Nos. 2352-3; 2353-3.

21 Wn. App. 277 (1978)

584 P.2d 482

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ANTONIA RODRIGUEZ PONCE, Appellant. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. HERIBERTO OZUNA, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

September 7, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Corrigan of Evergreen Legal Services, for appellants.

Arthur R. Eggers, Prosecuting Attorney, and Carl L. Johnson, Deputy, for respondent.


MUNSON, C.J.

This matter comes before the court upon an agreed set of facts. Both defendants were served with complaints alleging that they were habitual traffic offenders on the basis of their past driving convictions. (RCW 46.65.) In response to an order to show cause why they should not be found to be habitual traffic offenders, each defendant moved to dismiss the complaint against him arguing that the convictions underlying the complaints were invalid.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases