1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 260 Pa.Super.
  5. 260 Pa.Super. 17 (1978)
 

COM. v. MANCUSO

260 Pa.Super. 17 (1978)

393 A.2d 990

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Dominic MANCUSO, Joseph Mancuso, Jr., James Dill, Joseph Petzel, Jr., Raymond Martray and Richard Davis, Appellants.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided November 1, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.W. Ziegler, Jr., Pittsburgh, for appellants at Nos. 624, 625, 626, 627, and 628.

Mark F. Geary, Pittsburgh, for appellant at No. 639.

Joseph E. Ferens, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, and Conrad B. Capuzzi, District Attorney, Uniontown, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WATKINS, President Judge, and JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT and SPAETH, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

On August 9, 1977, the Supreme Court remanded the instant case to this Court1 to consider the following issues, properly preserved for our review: (1) whether the lower court erred in granting the Commonwealth's petition to extend the period in which to try appellants, Rule 1100(c), Pa.R.Crim.P., 19 P.S. Appendix, and (2) whether the lower court erred in denying appellants' motion for a change of venue.

In 1975, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases