1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 162 N.J.
  5. 162 N.J. Super. 84 (1978)
 

CLEAR TEL. CABLE CORP. v. BD. OF PUBLIC UTILITY

162 N.J. Super. 84 (1978)

392 A.2d 228

CLEAR TELEVISION CABLE CORPORATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE, NATIONAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC., INTERVENOR. NATIONAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE, CLEAR TELEVISION CABLE CORPORATION, INTERVENOR.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 30, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lewis J. Paper argued the cause for appellant Clear Television Cable Corporation (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl & Fisher, attorneys; Mr. Murray J. Laulicht, of counsel).

Mr. Francis R. Perkins argued the cause for appellant National Video Systems, Inc. (Messrs. Holzapfel & Perkins, attorneys).

Mr. Nielsen V. Lewis, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Board of Public Utility Commissioners (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. William F. Hyland, former Attorney General of New Jersey; Ms. Erminie Conley, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).

Mr. William J. Linton argued the cause for the Township of Dover (Mr. Raymond A. Hayser, Director of Law, attorney).

Mr. John S. Pehlivanian argued the cause for the Township of Berkeley (Messrs. Lomell, Muccifori, Adler, Kearney, Ravaschiere & Amabile, attorneys).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, CRANE and ANTELL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by ANTELL, J.A.D.

These appeals involve competing applications under the Cable Television Act, N.J.S.A. 48:5A-1 et seq., for certificates of approval to operate cable television systems in the beach areas of Dover Township and Berkeley Township in Ocean County. In Clear Television Cable Corporation [hereinafter "Clear"] v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners [hereinafter "Board"] Clear appeals from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases