STATE v. MANGOLD


164 N.J. Super. 74 (1978)

395 A.2d 869

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARY MANGOLD, JAMES ASCUITTO AND STEPHEN LA BIANCA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 22, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ms. Ileana N. Saros, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Clinton E. Cronin, Acting Monmouth County Prosecutor; Mr. Martin J. McGreevey, Assistant County Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Mark D. Sperber, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondents Mary Mangold and James Asciutto (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. James M. McGovern, Jr. argued the cause for respondent Stephen LaBianca (Messrs. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & Bonello, attorneys).

Before Judges HALPERN and ARD.


PER CURIAM.

These are consolidated interlocutory appeals by the State from a judgment suppressing evidence seized by the police during a warrantless automobile inventory search.

In this case we must strike a proper constitutional balance between the competing interests of society in the detection of crime and defendant's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable intrusions. The facts material to the issue involved are not in serious dispute and are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases