1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 164 N.J.
  5. 164 N.J. Super. 39 (1978)
 

STATE v. LIPSKY

164 N.J. Super. 39 (1978)

395 A.2d 555

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD LIPSKY AND CHRISTINA CANALEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 30, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard Newman argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Isles, Newman and Weissbard, attorneys).

Mr. Everett T. Denning, First Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Edward J. Turnbach, Prosecutor of Ocean County, attorney).

Before Judges LORA, MICHELS and LARNER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LARNER, J.A.D.

After a five-day jury trial Harold Lipsky, an attorney, and Christina Canaley were convicted on three counts of an indictment which charged both of them with conspiracy to obstruct justice, perjury by Canaley and subornation of perjury by Lipsky. While defendants advance several grounds of error, we deem it necessary to consider only the issue dealing with the substitution of an alternate juror during jury deliberations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases