1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 91 Wn.2d
  5. 91 Wn.2d 111 (1978)
 

RYDER v. KELLY-SPRINGFIELD TIRE

No. 45197.

91 Wn.2d 111 (1978)

587 P.2d 160

ESTATE OF SAMUEL A. RYDER, Appellant, v. KELLY-SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY, Defendant, ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

November 30, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duane Lansverk and Landerholm, Memovich, Lansverk, Whitesides, Marsh, Morse & Wilkinson, Inc., P.S. (Allen T. Murphy, of counsel), for appellant.

William M. Bauer and Detels, Draper & Marinkovich, for respondent.

HICKS, J.

In this product liability case, certified here by the Court of Appeals, judgment for defendants, Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa) and Kelly-Springfield Tire Company, was entered on a jury verdict following a 12-day trial. Appellant Ryder defines the issue on appeal to be the applicability of the concept of foreseeability in a product strict liability case and she assigns as error the instruction of the jury by the trial court. No other complaint is made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases