1000 FRIENDS OF ORE. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, ETC.

TC 30380; CA 6885; SC 25838; TC 30520; CA 6939; SC 25838.

584 P.2d 1371 (1978)

284 Or. 41

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, the Assumed Name of Oregon Land Use Project, Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation, Merritt E. Randles and Jo Anne Randles, Petitioners, v. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Benton County, Oregon, E. Larry Callahan, Chairman, and Dale D. Schrock and Jeannette Simerville, Respondents. 1000 Friends of Oregon, the Assumed Name of Oregon Land Use Project, Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation, Chester Cosgrove, Erma S. Cosgrove, Chester Chambers, Reta C. Chambers, Fred Lowther and Cindy Lowther, Petitioners, v. The Board of County Commissioners, Benton County, Oregon, E. Larry Callahan, Chairman, and Dale D. Schrock and Jeannette Simerville, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Supplement Accepted May 9, 1978.

Decided October 6, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Portland, on the Petition for Review.

No appearance by respondents.

Herbert H. Anderson, Harold C. Pope, Dezendorf, Spears, Lubersky & Campbell, Portland, filed a brief and supplement for Preserve Our Rural Environment and Charles Evers, as amici curiae.

James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., Al J. Laue, Sol. Gen., Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Peter S. Herman, Senior Counsel, Salem, filed a brief for the Land Conservation and Development Commission as amicus curiae.


Appellants' Petition for Review March 9, 1978.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek review of a decision of the Court of Appeals in which the same petitioners won a reversal and remand of a dismissal of a writ of review by the circuit court for Benton County. The litigation concerns the approval of two subdivision plans by the Benton County Board of Commissioners, which petitioners attacked for failing to comply with the "agricultural land" goal (Goal 3) of the State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases