CONNELLY v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION


577 P.2d 1362 (1978)

Dixie I. CONNELLY, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION and Salem Laundry Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted April 20, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Dye & Olson, Salem.

No appearance for respondent Employment Division.

Paul M. Rosa, Mill City, filed the brief for respondent Salem Laundry Co.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON, TANZER and BUTTLER, JJ.


SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

The issue in this unemployment compensation case is whether the petitioner had good cause for leaving her employment within the meaning of ORS 657.176(2). The referee held that she did; the Board held that she did not, and it is the Board's order from which she appeals. The Board's review is de novo; our review is confined to a search of the record to determine whether there is any substantial evidence to support the findings and conclusions of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases