STATE v. BARKER

No. 77-296.

53 Ohio St. 2d 135 (1978)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BARKER, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 22, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Michael DeWine, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. William F. Schenck, Jr., for appellee.

Brandabur, Campbell, Finlay, Johnson, McCormick & Weckstein Co., L. P. A., Mr. J. Timothy Campbell and Mr. Larry B. Morris, for appellant.


LOCHER, J.

I.

Appellant, in his first four propositions of law, contends that his confession and the fruits obtained therefrom were improperly admitted in evidence. This contention is premised upon several asserted reasons. First, appellant alleges that the police failed to properly advise him of his constitutional rights, pursuant to the mandate of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, by not explaining the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases