KARAS v. BROGAN

No. 77-1090.

55 Ohio St. 2d 128 (1978)

KARAS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BROGAN ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 19, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scavdis, for appellants Pete and "Wanda Karas.

Roger F. DiPaslo Co., L. P. A., and Mr. Antonios C.

Messrs. Ford & Martell and Mr. Donald H. Martell, for appellees Claude and Loretta Brogan.

Messrs. Federico, Myers & Enz and Mr. Robert E. Schuerman, for appellees Boyd and Joan Wallbrown.


Per Curiam.

The rule that acceptance must meet and correspond with the offer in every respect in order for an offer and acceptance to constitute a contract ordinarily presents a question as to whether there is in fact a material variance between the acceptance and the offer rather than any issue as to what principle of contract law applies. Burkhead v. Farlow (1966), 266 N.C. 595, 146 S.E.2d 802...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases