1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 582 F.2d
  5. 582 F.2d 1228 (1978)
 

MOORE v. JOHNSON

No. 75-2717.

582 F.2d 1228 (1978)

Isobel MOORE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald E. JOHNSON et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 28, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Diamond (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Philip S. Malinsky, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and CALLISTER, District Judge.

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

This case nicely illustrates the constitutional procedural due process screen through which tolerably plain and straight-forward statutory provisions sometimes must pass in order to discover their meaning as intended by Congress and as compelled by the Constitution, as interpreted by the courts. The principal statutes are 38 U.S.C. §§ 211 and 610 and the screen is derived from the Fifth Amendment. Whether the screen is necessary in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases