1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 573 P.2d
  5. 573 P.2d 1227 (1978)
 

NIEMINEN v. PITZER

573 P.2d 1227 (1978)

281 Or. 53

Donald NIEMINEN and Mary Nieminen, Husband and Wife, Respondents, v. Yvonne PITZER, Also Known As Yvonne Heck, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 2.

Decided January 24, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Petersen, Rainier, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Robert A. Lucas, P.C., Rainier.

Robert P. Van Natta, St. Helens, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief was George G. Van Natta, of Van Natta & Petersen, St. Helens.

Before DENECKE, C.J., TONGUE and BRYSON, JJ., and GILLETTE, J. Pro Tem.

DENECKE, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a consent decree on the ground that it was taken against defendant through her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, and from an order directing compliance with a portion of that decree. The questions before us are whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside the decree, and whether an order directing defendant to execute a conveyance in accordance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases