1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 578 F.2d
  5. 578 F.2d 1192 (1978)
 

COSTNER v. BLOUNT NAT. BANK OF MARYVILLE, TENN.

No. 76-2515.

578 F.2d 1192 (1978)

Paul Kermit COSTNER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The BLOUNT NATIONAL BANK OF MARYVILLE, TENNESSEE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided June 29, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jackson C. Kramer, James A. Ridley, III, David E. Rodgers, Kramer, Johnson, Rayson, Greenwood & McVeigh, Knoxville, Tenn., for defendant-appellant.

Norman H. Williams, J. Edward Ingram, Fowler, Rowntree, Fowler & Robertson, Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LIVELY and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, and RUBIN, District Judge.

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

A jury found the defendant bank civilly liable for violating the anti-tying provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1972 and the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The Bank Holding Company Act in essence applies the general anti-tying principles of the Sherman Act to the context of commercial banking, by prohibiting a bank, when it makes a loan, from requiring in return some business or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases