The issue before this court is whether the respondent has a right to the office of city solicitor by virtue of the requirement in R. C. 733.49 that a "city solicitor" be "an elector of the (same) city," which respondent admittedly is not. (Parenthetical material added.)
Respondent argues that Section 3, Article XVIII of the Constitution of Ohio, authorizes municipalities to establish requirements...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
