STATE v. SCOTT

No. 78-02; CA 10777.

583 P.2d 1156 (1978)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Edd SCOTT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 6, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tyler E. Marshall, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Bouneff, Muller & Marshall, Portland.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before THORNTON, P.J., and TANZER and BUTTLER, JJ.


THORNTON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was charged with custodial interference in the second degree. ORS 163.245.1 At trial he demurred to the complaint on the ground that it did not contain an allegation that the person enticed was under the age of 16. The trial court overruled the demurrer and defendant was convicted.

The only issue on appeal is whether ORS 163.245(1) should be construed to mean that a person 16 years or older...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases