ASSOC. CLASSROOM TCHRS. OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BD. OF ED., ETC.

Nos. 50260, 51789.

576 P.2d 1157 (1978)

ASSOCIATED CLASSROOM TEACHERS OF OKLAHOMA CITY, INC., Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 89 OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, Oklahoma, Pat Potts, Armond Start, Dene Brown, Floyd Donwerth, Paul English, Betty Hill, Freddye Williams, Individually and jointly as members of the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, Appellees, and Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers Local 2309, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, Appellees-Intervenors. ASSOCIATION OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS OF OKLAHOMA CITY, INC., a non-profit corporation, Petitioner, v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 89 OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, Oklahoma, Pat Potts, Armond Start, Arthur Hill, Floyd Donwerth, Paul English, Betty Hill, Freddye Williams, in their official capacities as Members of the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 21, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fagin, Hewett, Mathews & Fagin by Arnold D. Fagin and Ronald E. Stakem, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Jernigan, Groves, Bleakley, Hood & Moorman by William P. Bleakley, Oklahoma City, for appellees Board of Education.

Kenneth R. Nance, Oklahoma City, for appellees AFL-CIO.

Fagin, Hewett, Mathews & Fagin by Arnold D. Fagin, Clifford A. Jones, Ronald E. Stakem, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Jernigan, Groves, Bleakley, Hood & Moorman by Eric J. Groves, William P. Bleakley, Judith Slayman Onken (Legal Intern), Oklahoma City, for respondents.


DAVISON, Justice:

In September, 1976, the Association of Classroom Teachers of Oklahoma City, Inc., a non-profit corporation, whom we shall refer to as ACT, brought an action for specific performance of collective bargaining contract, against the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County, which we shall refer to as School Board. The central issue in that suit was whether or not ACT was entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases