1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 81 Mich.
  5. 81 Mich. App. 91 (1978)
 

ADAMS v. GREAT A. & P. TEA CO.

Docket No. 27709.

81 Mich. App. 91 (1978)

265 N.W.2d 53

ADAMS v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided February 6, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ripple & Chambers, P.C. (by Sanford L. Steiner), for plaintiff.

Lacey & Jones (by John L. Salter), for defendant.

Before: D.C. RILEY, P.J., and BASHARA and P.R. MAHINSKE, JJ.

BASHARA, J.

The pertinent facts of this case are delineated in Judge MAHINSKE'S concurring opinion. We conclude that procedural policy mandates reversal of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board determination and reinstatement of the referee's order.

Whether a dispute or controversy persists after an employer agrees to make voluntary payments, is an issue that exceeds the scope of inquiry required for the resolution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases