STATE v. BRADFORD

Nos. 77-1355 and 77-1384.

55 Ohio St. 2d 116 (1978)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BRADFORD, APPELLANT. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 19, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. George J. Sadd, for appellee in both cases.

Mr. Paul Mancino, Jr., for appellants.


Per Curiam.

Although Am. Sub. H. B. No. 300 provides that one serving a sentence shall be released if there is no substantially equivalent offense on the effective date specified in the act and any person serving a sentence of imprisonment for an offense that remains an offense after the effective date of the act but which would entail a lesser penalty shall have his existing sentence modified in conformity with the penalties provided by this act, it is clear...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases