LA FRONZ v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION


164 N.J. Super. 5 (1978)

395 A.2d 538

THOMAS LA FRONZ AND WEEHAWKEN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 16, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. LeRoy D. Safro argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Theodore M. Simon argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Goldberg & Simon, attorneys; Mr. Louis P. Bucceri on the brief).

A letter in lieu of brief was filed on behalf of the Attorney General, amicus curiae.

Before Judges ALLCORN, SEIDMAN and BOTTER.


PER CURIAM.

Whether the resolutions the validity of which are questioned in this proceeding are treated as having been adopted by the appellant board at its special meeting of June 29, 1976 or at its regularly scheduled meeting of July 13, 1976, we are convinced that they were properly adopted, that their adoption did not violate the Sunshine Law, and that they consequently are valid and operable.

As to the special...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases