1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 457 F.Supp.
  5. 457 F.Supp. 1221 (1978)
 

UNITED STATES v. HUBER

No. 77 Cr. 670 (CHT).

457 F.Supp. 1221 (1978)

UNITED STATES of America v. Karl R. HUBER, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

September 21, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Fiske, Jr., U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City, for the Government; George E. Wilson, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel.

Bohrer & Ullman, New York City, for defendant; Barry A. Bohrer, Elliot A. Taikeff, New York City, of counsel.

MEMORANDUM

TENNEY, District Judge.

The defendant, Karl R. Huber, has moved to quash the indictments handed up against him by grand juries1 of this district on grounds that those juries were selected by a process that constitutes a "substantial failure" to comport with the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968 ("the Act"), 28 U.S.C. § 1861 et seq.; id. § 1867(d). Although this motion was originally proffered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases