VANDEHEY v. PUMILITE GLASS & BLDG. CO.

No. 76-9286; CA 9837.

580 P.2d 1068 (1978)

35 Or.App. 187

In the matter of the Compensation of Clair VANDEHEY, Claimant, Petitioner, v. PUMILITE GLASS & BUILDING COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 5, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan O'Leary, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, Kahn & O'Leary, Portland.

Don G. Swink, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and JOHNSON, GILLETTE and ROBERTS, JJ.


GILLETTE, Judge.

In this workers' compensation case, we are faced with a single legal issue: under ORS 656.386, and after claimant has sought a hearing on the existence of a need for further medical evaluation or treatment, may he send a doctor's report supporting his contention to the employer and be entitled to an award of attorney's fees if the report is not treated by the employer as a new claim?

The factual setting of this case is not disputed. Claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases