SHULMAN, Judge.
Appellant brings this appeal from his conviction for burglary. He enumerates as error the refusal of the trial court to give the jury an instruction on the defense of entrapment and the court's charge on the law of direct
1. Under the facts here, there was no requirement for an instruction on entrapment. The evidence showed that law enforcement agents merely provided an opportunity for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
