PER CURIAM:
In his habeas petition before the trial court, Culp contended that his fifth and eighth amendment rights were violated in the denial of his parole by the United States Parole Commission and the National Appeals Board. On appeal he asserts that the procedure utilized by the Commission violated his due process rights. Bound by the decision in Brown v. Lundgren,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.