UNITED STATES v. ROSALES

No. 77-3282.

584 F.2d 870 (1978)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank Patrick ROSALES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing October 23, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark L. Webb (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Emerson E. Stafford, H. Jesse Arnelle, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HUG, Circuit Judges.


As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc October 23, 1978.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals from a ruling made sua sponte by the district court suppressing evidence sought to be introduced against Rosales at his trial for controlled substance violations. At issue is the admissibility of the testimony of a government agent as to statements of an alleged coconspirator naming Rosales as his source of drugs. We reverse.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases