1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 449 F.Supp.
  5. 449 F.Supp. 983 (1978)
 

BRADLEY v. MANDEL

Civ. A. No. T-76-638.

449 F.Supp. 983 (1978)

Bruce BRADLEY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Marvin MANDEL et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

Decided May 4, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. Pembroke, Washington, D. C., James M. Smith, Gebhardt & Smith, Baltimore, Md., Jon T. Brown, Duncan, Brown, Weinberg & Palmer, Washington, D. C., P.C., for plaintiffs.

Robert A. Zarnoch, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, and George A. Nilson, Deputy Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for defendants.

Before WINTER, Circuit Judge, THOMSEN, Senior District Judge, and KAUFMAN, District Judge.

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

This case is before us again on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Mandel v. Bradley, 432 U.S. 173, 97 S.Ct. 2238, 53 L.Ed.2d 199 (1977). The Supreme Court construed our previous unreported opinion as placing excessive reliance on the summary affirmance in Tucker v. Salera, 424 U.S. 959, 96 S.Ct. 1451, 47 L.Ed.2d 727 (1976), affirming, 399 F.Supp. 1258

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases