ERICKSON, Justice.
Richard Lambert, the appellant, was convicted by a jury of criminal impersonation (section 18-5-113(1)(e), C.R.S.1973), and theft (section 18-4-401, C.R.S.1973). On appeal, he asserts three grounds for reversal. Our review of the briefs and the record satisfies us that reversible error did not occur. Therefore, we affirm.
First, the appellant contends that section 18-5-113(1)(e), C.R.S.1973, is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. This...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
