PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the record, this court finds that there is insufficient evidence to sustain the appellant's conviction for uttering a forgery. There was no evidence that the appellant had knowledge that the signature, which appeared on a check which he presented for cashing, was a forgery. Under such circumstances the appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted.
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed with directions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
