STATE v. HANNAH

No. 77-73.

54 Ohio St. 2d 84 (1978)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HANNAH, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 19, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Thomas J. Wagner, for appellee.

Messrs. Wyner & Wyner and Mr. Jeffrey G. Wyner, for appellant.


PAUL W. BROWN, J.

Appellant's principal complaint addressed to the fairness of the proceedings at trial is that his counsel was frustrated in his attempted cross-examination of the victim-witness which was designed to elicit inconsistencies between that witness' testimony and his pre-trial statements. Appellee's response to that contention is that the inquiry was not artfully pursued and that defendant's counsel made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases