1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 390 A.2d
  5. 390 A.2d 992 (1978)
 

WEISBERG v. WILLIAMS, CONNOLLY & CALIFANO

No. 12772.

390 A.2d 992 (1978)

Harold WEISBERG and Lillian Weisberg, Appellants, v. WILLIAMS, CONNOLLY & CALIFANO et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided August 14, 1978.

Rehearing En Banc Denied October 4, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Lesar, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

David N. Webster, Washington, D. C., with whom Robert L. Weinberg, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before KELLY, YEAGLEY and MACK, Associate Judges.

KELLY, Associate Judge:

The trial court dismissed a complaint for legal malpractice filed October 21, 1976, by appellants Harold and Lillian Weisberg, against the law firm of Williams, Connolly & Califano.1 Appellants claim on appeal that the trial court erred in determining that their malpractice suit was barred by the statute of limitations. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.

In Count I of the complaint, appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases