U. S. FOR USE & BEN. OF LANK, ETC. v. CSH CONTRACTORS

Civ. No. 78-463.

452 F.Supp. 922 (1978)

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of LANK WOODWORK CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. CSH CONTRACTORS, INC. and Aetna Insurance Co., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia, Civil Division.

July 6, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul M. Vincent, Carlyle C. Ring, Jr., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Gregory D. Haight, Falls Church, Va., for CSH Contractors, Inc.

Edward Gallagher, Washington, D. C., for Aetna Ins. Co.


MEMORANDUM

JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.

The sole issue raised by the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the subcontractor and surety in this action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a, 270b, is whether the action was timely filed under the one-year limitations period incorporated in the Act. Id. § 270b(b). To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, a party must demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact, viewed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases