1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 382 N.E.2d
  5. 382 N.E.2d 989 (1978)
 

HASTE v. INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT CO.

No. 2-1076A392.

382 N.E.2d 989 (1978)

Roy H. HASTE, David Koss, Gloria M. Schwarts, et al., Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Appellee (Defendant below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District.

Rehearing Denied December 26, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert V. Bridwell and Paul Hirsch, Haymaker, Hirsch & Fink, Indianapolis, for appellants.

Alan W. Boyd, Jerry P. Belknap, Jon D. Noland, Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer & Boyd, Marcus E. Woods, Indianapolis, for appellee.

YOUNG, Judge.

Plaintiffs challenge the trial court's decision to dismiss their complaint.1 The trial court took this action in response to a motion to dismiss asserting lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Ind.Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 12(B)(1). The sole issue before us is whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction. We conclude that it did not, thus we affirm.

The events giving rise to this appeal are as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases