MADDOX, Justice.
The question presented is whether the defendant is entitled to a new trial because of the injection into the case of the fact that the defendant had insurance. We find prejudicial error and reverse.
The matter first arose when the defendant's attorney sought to cross-examine the plaintiff about a statement contained in a letter which plaintiff's doctor had furnished to plaintiff's attorney, but which plaintiff denied having seen:
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
