1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 396 A.2d
  5. 396 A.2d 956 (1978)
 

TULOWITZKI v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY

396 A.2d 956 (1978)

Richard C. TULOWITZKI, Plaintiff below, Appellant, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Defendant below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided November 1, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven D. Goldberg, of Theisen, Lank, Mulford & Goldberg, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellant.

Louis J. Finger, of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, for defendant below, appellee.

Before HERRMANN, Chief Justice, BIFFERATO and LONGOBARDI, Judges.

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

The plaintiff, Richard C. Tulowitzki, appeals the Chancery Court's decision that the relationship between Tulowitzki and the defendant Atlantic Richfield Company was not a "franchise" under Delaware's Franchise Security Law, 6 Del.C. § 2551 et seq., or under the developing franchise case law; and that the vapor recovery equipment agreement that Atlantic required plaintiff to sign...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases