1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 570 F.2d
  5. 570 F.2d 773 (1978)
 

TRI-STATE MOTOR TRANS. CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 77-1359.

570 F.2d 773 (1978)

TRI-STATE MOTOR TRANSIT CO., Petitioner, and Davis Transport, Inc., Intervenor-Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Respondents, and Superior Trucking Co., Inc., Cherokee Hauling & Rigging, Inc., A. J. Metler Hauling & Rigging, Inc., and Moss Trucking Co., Inc., Intervenor-Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided February 16, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Thomson of Linde, Thomson, Fairchild, Langworthy & Kohn, Kansas City, Mo., argued, and Max G. Morgan, Oklahoma City, Okl., on brief, for petitioner TriState Motor Transit.

H. S. Melton, Jr., Paducah, Ky., argued, and Gregory M. Rebman, St. Louis, Mo., on brief, for intervenor-petitioner, Davis Transport, Inc.

Wayne M. Senville, I. C. C., Washington, D. C., argued and John H. Shenefield, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert J. Wiggers and Robert B. Nicholson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Mark L. Evans, Gen. Counsel, and Charles H. White, Jr., Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., on brief for respondents ICC and United States.

Paul M. Daniell, Atlanta, Ga., argued, Morton E. Kiel, New York City and Ernest A. Brooks, II, St. Louis, Mo., on brief, for intervenors-respondents, Superior Trucking Co., Inc., et al.

Before MATTHES, Senior Circuit Judge, BRIGHT and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.

MATTHES, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Tri-State Motor Transit Co. seeks review of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission granting respondent-intervenors, Superior Trucking Co., Inc., Cherokee Hauling & Rigging, Inc., A. J. Metler Hauling & Rigging, Inc., and Moss Trucking Co., Inc., authority to operate as

common carrier[s] by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, of source, special nuclear, and by-product materials, radioactive materials...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases