1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 448 F.Supp.
  5. 448 F.Supp. 840 (1978)
 

UNITED STATES v. DE LILLO

No. 77 CR 401.

448 F.Supp. 840 (1978)

UNITED STATES of America v. Andrew DE LILLO and William De Koning, Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. New York.

April 21, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David G. Trager, U. S. Atty., E. D. N. Y. by James Harmon, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Strike Force), for plaintiff.

Williams & Connolly, Washington, D. C., for defendant De Lillo.

Catterson & Nolan, Port Jefferson, N. Y., for defendant De Koning.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

GEORGE C. PRATT, District Judge:

An attorney-witness has asserted the attorney-client privilege on behalf of his former client. The question presented is whether and to what extent either the witness, who is a former attorney for a union pension fund, or the defendant, who is a former trustee of the fund, may raise the attorney-client privilege to protect communications concerning the fund's business (a) between the attorney and the entire...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases