1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 580 F.2d
  5. 580 F.2d 704 (1978)
 

HOWLETTE v. CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

No. 78-1296.

580 F.2d 704 (1978)

M. Philmore HOWLETTE and William V. Daniel, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, and Richmond Independent Taxpayers Association, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, William J. Leidinger, City Manager and H. Jack Lissenden, Director of Finance, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided July 20, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Shapiro, Caudle & Shapiro, Richmond, Va., for appellants.

Michael W. Smith, Richmond, Va. (Conard B. Mattox, Jr., City Atty., and Andrew J. Brent, Lee F. Davis, Jr., Leslie W. Mullins, Christian, Barton Epps, Brent & Chappell, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellees.

Before BUTZNER, RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appellants contest a judgment of the district court upholding the constitutionality of a provision of the charter of the City of Richmond requiring each signature of a qualified voter on a petition for a referendum to be verified before a notary. For reasons adequately stated in the memorandum of the district court, Howlette v. The City of Richmond, C/A No. 78-0215-R (April 14, 1978), we conclude that the ordinance is valid. Cf. American...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases