HOLLOWELL v. CARTER


574 P.2d 708 (1978)

32 Or.App. 597

Arthur J. HOLLOWELL, Appellant, v. William CARTER and City of Medford, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 13, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur J. Hollowell, Central Point, filed the briefs for appellant.

John W. Eads, Jr., City Atty., Medford, filed the brief for respondents.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON and JOSEPH, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether a layman has a legal right, by virtue of the justice court statutes, to act as an attorney for another in a municipal court.1 He does not. Balcom v. Municipal Court, 23 Or.App. 218, 541 P.2d 1307, rev. den. (1975).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases