Appellant bases his appeal on his belief that a conviction of complicity in which the identity of an offender is established by the testimony of an accomplice is invalid pursuant to R. C. 2923.03(D), effective January 1, 1974, unless said testimony is supported by other probative evidence. There was evidence by witnesses other than Willoughby to support a jury finding that the crime charged was committed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.