POLIZOS v. OR. LIQUOR CONTROL COM'N

CA 10538.

588 P.2d 681 (1978)

37 Or.App. 757

Konstantinos A. POLIZOS, Alexandros Polizos and Haralambos Polizos, Dba Acropolis Club, Petitioners, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon.

Decided December 26, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie M. Roberts, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief was Kell, Alterman & Runstein, Portland.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON, TANZER and BUTTLER, JJ.


TANZER, Judge.

Petitioners appeal a denial by the OLCC of their application for a Class A distributor's license, contending that the order is deficient because the findings of fact are not supported by substantial evidence and the conclusions of law are unsupported by statute, rule or reason.

The Findings

The Commission made these findings of fact:

"1. The Polizos brothers are applying for a Class `A' dispenser license (DA) in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases