PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of possession of more than five grams of marijuana, which was located in a shed on a ranch owned by A. Douda & Sons. The evidence is entirely circumstantial and it is not inconsistent with appellant's innocence. Thus, there is insufficient evidence upon which to support the conviction.
Accordingly, the other points raised need not be considered because our determination requires a reversal of the judgment and sentence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.