1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 462 F.Supp.
  5. 462 F.Supp. 732 (1978)
 

ROHM AND HAAS CO. v. MOBIL OIL CORP.

Civ. A. No. 78-384.

462 F.Supp. 732 (1978)

ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

December 12, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudolph E. Hutz, William E. Lambert III, James M. Mulligan, N. Richard Powers, and George W. F. Simmons of Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Edmund D. Lyons of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, Del., and John A. Diaz, J. Robert Dailey and Arnold I. Rady of Morgan, Finnegan, Pine, Foley & Lee, New York City, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LATCHUM, Chief Judge.

This action is before the Court on defendant Mobil Oil Corporation's ("Mobil") motion for a stay pending decision by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") on Mobil's application for reissue of the patent in suit. The parties have briefed and argued the motion and this Memorandum Opinion addresses their contentions.

Plaintiff, Rohm and Haas Company ("Rohm & Haas"), filed this action on September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases