BITUMINOUS INS. CO. v. PETTY

No. 6613.

362 So.2d 815 (1978)

BITUMINOUS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. H. D. PETTY et al., Defendants-Appellants, George W. Cline, III, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

August 4, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brame, Bergstedt & Brame, David A. Fraser, Lake Charles, for third-party defendant, and third-party plaintiffs-appellants.

Plauche, Smith, Hebert & Nieset, Reid K. Hebert, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellees.

Burton & Nichols by James K. Nichols, DeRidder, for defendant-appellee.

Before DOMENGEAUX, GUIDRY and CUTRER, JJ.


GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Gus Stacy, Jr., et al. v. H. D. Petty, et al., 362 So.2d 810 (La.App.3rd Cir. 1978), our Docket No. 6614, we conclude that the judgment of the district court properly disposes of the issues presented. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed at appellants' cost.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases