The claimant contends that the board erred in considering certain medical evidence; by authorizing payment rates to be adjusted on a retroactive basis; and by approving a fee to an attorney who had represented the claimant although the attorney had been discharged prior to the decision appealed from. Issues of fact are for the board and the payment of benefits at tentative rates and/or reduced earnings is not prejudicial to the claimant. The board found upon its review of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
