The board on "credible" evidence found: "that the claimant lost her employment as a result of using foul language in a customer's presence. In light of her prior warnings this constituted misconduct in connection with her employment". The record does not contain substantial evidence to support the finding that the claimant used "foul" language (the word at issue is "damn") or that such language would be a violation of company rules. Further, the "prior warnings" given this...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
