1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 403 Mich.
  5. 403 Mich. 711 (1978)
 

STITT v. MAHANEY

Docket No. 59150, (Calendar No. 1).

403 Mich. 711 (1978)

272 N.W.2d 526

STITT v. MAHANEY

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 22, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Mackay for plaintiff.

Hillman, Baxter & Hammond for defendant Mahaney.

Cholette, Perkins & Buchanan (by Edward D. Wells) for defendant DeWitt.

Norris & Keyser, P.C. (by Reginald L. Norris and J. Stephen Marshall), for defendant Gesink.

Kitch & Suhrheinrich, P.C. (by Richard R. DeNardis and Gregory G. Drutchas), for defendant City of Holland.

Decided December 22, 1978. Rehearing denied 406 Mich. 1102.

RYAN, J.

I agree that plaintiff is entitled to a new trial. However, I do not agree with Justice WILLIAMS' answer to the first question posed in this case. The release of the original tortfeasor was relevant to this suit against these alleged successive tortfeasors and was properly admitted in evidence.

I. ADMISSIBILITY OF THE RELEASE

I do not agree that the language of the printed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases